Project: Motion Validator
Tl;dr: A deep audit for court filings.
The problem we solved
A citation may be partly or entirely hallucinated. Maybe by AI, maybe by human error.
A citation can exist, have the correct pin-cite or neutral citation, and still be wrong. The case can be real, the quote accurate, and the application completely backwards. Or worse, the quote inaccurate, and the holding completely made-up. Surface-level citation checking misses the error that actually matters: whether the authority supports the proposition.
This is where sanctions happen. Where motions fail. Where AI-assisted drafting creates new categories of risk.
What it checks
Case law: Existence, binding authority, subsequent treatment, correct application of holdings, Bluebook formatting.
Statutes: Existence, current force, proper application, correct citation format.
Procedure: Court-specific rules, motion-type requirements, local formatting specifications — including the local rules that trip up out-of-jurisdiction counsel.
How it works
Document on the left. Audit on the right. Green means verified. Red means attention required — with an explanation of exactly what’s wrong.
No platform to learn. No migration. No dashboard.
Upload. Verify. File.
Privacy
Documents are not training data. PII is stripped before processing. Auto-delete after five days. Built for practitioners who understand what privilege means.
Availability
MotionValidator is currently in private preview.